History as coincidence versus history as conspiracy

I like to study history. I have been fascinated by the subject ever since I was a kid, poring over the large leather-bound World War II history books  in my father’s library. In my university days at The University of Texas,  I took a minor in it. Over time, the courses became less and less interesting as I grew weary of the dry, overly academic tone of most  texts and the focus on dates, battles, and ‘important’ figures, i.e. kings, queens, generals, and conquerors.

I began to seek out history books that dealt with the subject from the viewpoint of the victims instead of the victors. I found Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States (1995) and Dee Brown’s Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee (1971). 

 

Bury_My_Heart_at_Wounded_Knee_coverAlthough reading history from the victim’s viewpoint was a refreshing change, all of the writers and professors were still approaching the subject  from the view of history as ‘accidental.’ This way of looking at and studying history is so ingrained within the academic establishment that most people are completely unaware that there is another way of looking at our past. This alternative school of thought looks at the past through the lens of conspiracy. This is called ‘the conspiratorial view of history.’ While mainstream historians view the important events in history as accidental, coincidental, or even random, the alternative school  sees conspiracies and patterns.

A conspiracy has three components: It must involve two or more people, it must use  tactics that are immoral or have coercion,  and the objective of these tactics must be illegal or immoral.

 

thumbnail.aspViewing history in this way opens up vast new areas of research and sheds light on hitherto ‘unexplainable’ events.  Researchers and writers such as Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins, G. Edward Griffin, David Icke, Gary Allen, Jordan Maxwell, Jim Marrs, Jim Garrison and many others have worked tirelessly and radically against the grain to bring the conspiratorial  view into the conversation.  No historian who teaches from this angle is going to be offered tenure; we are not there yet. But at least many of these writers are now able to get major publishing houses to print their books, a change from 60 years ago when  Eustace Mullins had 18 publishers turn down his manuscript about the founding of the Federal Reserve System.

 

For researchers who do take the plunge into conspiracy , they can expect to be attacked often and mercilessly. The frontal assault comes from those in the academic, media, and political establishment, who  brand them with epithets such as ‘conspiracy theorist, anti-semite, holocaust denier, quack, wacko, lunatic, nutcase, buffoon’ , and many, many more. The mainstream have tried to dismiss outright the research done by these writers offhand, without ever looking at the actual evidence, using age-old tricks such as ad hominem attacks.

The rear assault comes from the public, including friends, neighbors, family, and colleagues who ask the common question: “Why do you see a conspiracy in everything?”

 

516P995FZTLThe brilliant writer G. Edward Griffin, during a lecture on the late Carroll Quigley,  had this to say on the subject of conspiracies: “Those who dismiss conspiracy have obviously never read a history book, for if they had, they would know that history is built on conspiracies. Conspiracy is the engine of history. Every major event has come to pass as a result of one, or many, conspiracies. Nor have they ever sat in a courtroom, for if they had, they would have heard the judges and lawyers discuss the ‘charges of conspiracy.’ Conspiracies are a fact of life!”

cover.225x225-75Indeed they are, and until the masses wake up to this fact, they will continue to be the victims of conspiracies, large and small. There are no coincidences in life, and certainly not in politics and global events.

 

 

 

One thought on “History as coincidence versus history as conspiracy”

  1. At times I think everyone is branded as a conspiracy theorist if they dare take an alternative view of anything , or, said another way, critically think. Fortunately or unfortunately for me about seventy five percent of what was branded as conspiracy theory was true. There are, of course, some “out there” claims but they gain their own life by being used as the examples why one should believe the propaganda macine. The ultimate war is as the military says for your minds and thereby your hearts or will. This is a true conspiracy on the part of global elitist corporate greed. They pump you up on drama, their drama, but expect you to ignore all else. Lizards never sleep. As Boy George Bush said,”You’re either with us or with the Terrorists”. Remember 9/11. Still think it was people with two flight lessons in single engine aircraft and some utility knives? If so, the good news is you aren’t a conspiracy theorist. The bad news is you are bordering on brain dead. WMD’s in Iraq? Now that was some kind of conspiracy theory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *